Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Gaining deeper understanding of taxes
By Kay Rand Portland Press Herald Monday, April 30, 2007

About the Author
Kay Rand is managing director of Bernstein Shur Government Solutions and former chief of staff to Gov. Angus King.
The Tax Foundation just released its annual study of state and local tax burdens. Unfortunately, Maine is in second-highest place, just behind Vermont.
This survey always results in headlines and a new round of commentary on taxes and out-of-control spending in Augusta.
There is no question that Maine's taxes are too high and need to be brought down, but there is additional information that might help us to better understand Maine's situation so that we can make better choices about solutions.
The first question is, what is "tax burden" and what does it mean that ours is high? ÝDoes it mean that our tax rates are higher? ÝDoes it mean that Maine's state and local governments spend more per person than other states? And who pays what share of these high taxes?
These and other questions were the topic of a recent tax forum hosted by the law firm Bernstein Shur at the University of Southern Maine's Abromson Center. ÝSeveral hundred business and civic leaders gathered to go beyond the headlines and gain a deeper understanding of this issue.
Here are some of the key points from the event:
1. Maine government spending per person is 12th in the country and fifth lowest out of the six New England states. High, but not the first place the headlines might make you think.
2. The "tax burden" to which the reports refer is a percentage figure that comes from adding up all taxes collected by state and local governments and then dividing that number by the total income of all Mainers. But not the income of "out-of-staters." In other words, Martha Stewart's taxes count but not her income. So whenever you hear "tax burden," remember that there are two parts to the calculation -- taxes collected and personal income. Each is equally important in determining the result.
3. To follow up on this, if Maine's per capita income were as high as it is in Massachusetts, our tax burden would rank 42nd instead of second. This means that we have to focus on building incomes just as much as cutting taxes, and that one of our best hopes for long-term tax relief is wise economic investing. The irony is that economic investments like education and research and development often increase spending, at least temporarily.
4. Almost 10 percent of Maine's tax burden is borne by out-of-staters, mostly through the sales tax and local property taxes. This is one of the highest rates in the country. It is believed that Maine exports more of its tax burden than most states because of the high percentage of real estate that is owned by non-residents.
The only other state with a comparable analysis, Minnesota, exports 2.3 percent of its tax burden, only one-quarter of our amount.
The result of this shift, according to Maine Revenue Services estimates, is that the tax burden actually borne by Maine residents is 11.8 percent of personal income, and not the 14 percent reported in the Tax Foundation report, dropping us from second in the rankings to about 10th.
5. Unlike Maine, many states have chosen to significantly increase user fees rather than taxes to pay for governmental services. If we charged user fees for government-provided services at the average rate of other states, our tax burden would fall at least another 10 places among the 50 states.
While shifting from taxes to fees may be politically adroit (your state looks better on the tax burden rating), it is regressive in nature because user fees fall more heavily on lower-income people.
6. Tax burden varies with fluctuations in the economy, often going up when the economy is booming because government collects more revenue. Maine's sales tax rate was reduced from 6 percent to 5 percent over the last decade, but this reduction did not lighten our tax burden because of an increase in overall sales.
7. When it comes to business taxes, Maine is competitive. The corporate income tax, for example, is substantially lower in Maine than it is in New Hampshire.
This isn't an elaborate excuse for high taxes. Everyone agrees we have to bring them down. But these facts do give us some needed perspective and perhaps can help us approach this debate with a better understanding of what we're up against -- and how we can fix it.
- Special to the Press HeraldWe have to focus on building incomes just as much as cutting taxes.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

What\'sNext of Cumberland, ME
May 2, 2007 3:34 PM
Whether it's this report or countless others....I hold little optimism about their impact on actual policy change when it comes to Maine's tax burden. Seems our legislators are totally ignorant and/or carefree about what Maine residents are actually concerned about and what relief’s are truly important. There's a word for that.....brain-dead.report abuse
Zacchaeus of Winthrop, ME
Apr 30, 2007 4:33 PM
There are people who winter in Florida and still declare Maine as their residence. There are many more who change their residency to Florida solely because of the income tax burden. Try to find another state that takes 8.5% in income tax from their lower and middle class. Bill Richardson cut the top rate in New Mexico over 30% and New Mexico is doing very well. Other governors have made cuts. All we get is a "study" that says the burden really isn't so bad. But we can now stop all the outerstaters and fine them for not wearing a seat belt. report abuse
Jim of Gray, ME
Apr 30, 2007 3:23 PM
Maine is competitive vs. NH in Corporate taxes? Where did this info come from? How about all of the local Excise Taxes on commerical and personal property? Or the crazy system in place for Workers Comp, Health Insurance, and the ever popular Unemployement Benefits? Talk about tilting the table to your side. To say if Maine income was compatible to Mass we would be near the bottom of the list is like saying if a frog had wings he would not bump his rear end when he jumps. It is never going to happen and has no impact on this arguement......And then the finest in the art of a taxation specialist, calling them fee's so they don't count toward the total taxation formula. This entire article reeks of a socialist adgenda which is being readied in Augusta. report abuse
weatherfreak of Great Pond, ME
Apr 30, 2007 12:49 PM

"Deeper Understanding"???

Yeah, I fully "Understand" that they will continue to dig "Deeper" into my pocketbook.

Where do I sign up for Welfare and food stamps? What the heck, if you can't beat them, join them!report abuse

Show all 16 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.