enlarge
John Ewing/Staff PhotographerMAINE STATE PIER REDEVELOPMENT
FEB. 22, 2007: Portland officials unwrap two competing plans to redevelop the Maine State Pier with a hotel, office building, restaurants and docking space for cruise ships and other vessels. The $90 million proposals are backed by New Hampshire-based Ocean Properties Ltd. and The Olympia Cos., based in Portland.
APRIL 2007: Portland's redevelopment effort might be in jeopardy because a state agency disputes the city's ownership of submerged land beneath the 85-year-old pier. The Maine Department of Conservation notifies city officials that new zoning and two competing $90 million proposals to redevelop the dilapidated pier might conflict with state laws protecting public use of waterways.
JUNE 2007: Olympia indicates it might sue the city if the rival company wins the project. Ocean Properties has said little about the selection process in Portland, but the developer has had legal run-ins with Portsmouth and Bar Harbor. The possibility of future legal problems comes in the final weeks of the selection process, as Portland officials scrutinize the track records of the firms.
JULY 11, 2007: The City Council's community development committee votes 2-1 to recommend choosing Ocean Properties.
SEPT. 17, 2007: The council deadlocks 4-4 on selecting a developer. Neither company gets the five votes needed to enter talks with the city for development rights.
OCT. 15, 2007: The council deadlocks again on choosing a winning bidder. The impasse means the issue will remain unresolved when Portland voters fill three open council seats in Nov. 6 elections, leaving the new council to resolve the debate.
NOV. 6, 2007: Voters change the balance on the council by electing an Olympia supporter to replace a councilor who backs its competitor. John Anton's victory over incumbent Jim Cloutier gives Olympia the five votes it needs to be selected the city's partner for the now-$100 million project.
DEC. 3, 2007: Councilors choose Olympia on a 5-3 vote, ending a three-month impasse.
MARCH 28, 2008: A legislative committee kills a bill that would have made it easier for Olympia to obtain financing for the project. The bill would have allowed the city to lease submerged land under the pier for a longer period than currently allowed.
AUGUST 2008: Portland officials plan to grant a 75-year lease to Olympia to redevelop the pier, a decision that could make it easier to find loans for the project but puts the city at odds with the state. The lease is one of two major developments contained in a document related to the $100 million redevelopment deal. The other twist: A proposed deep-water berth was removed from the pier renovation plan. City officials asked Olympia to build the berth before it begins $18 million in pier renovations, and that project now will move forward separately from the pier plan.
NOV. 12, 2008: The council's community development committee recommends that the city terminate negotiations with Olympia. If city councilors agree, the pier project will be dead for the time being. City officials and a spokesman for the developer confirm that negotiations broke down after the state asserted its rights to ownership of the sea floor under the pier.
– Compiled by Staff Researcher Beth Murphy
The city of Portland plans to sue the state of Maine to resolve the question of who owns the submerged land under the Maine State Pier, after a $100 million deal to redevelop the waterfront property collapsed because of the ongoing dispute.
And the decision on how to proceed with developing the pier – now that an agreement with The Olympia Cos. has fallen apart – will be made after a new City Council is sworn in Dec. 1, city officials said Thursday.
The council is scheduled to vote Monday on a recommendation to terminate negotiations with Olympia. The city and developer said the deal fell apart because ownership of the underwater land remains in dispute.
"At the end of the day, it was this one issue we couldn't get by," City Councilor Cheryl Leeman, a member of the negotiating committee dealing with Olympia, said at a City Hall news conference.
City Attorney Gary Wood said Portland plans to file a lawsuit against the state by January to settle the property claim. It might take a year to 18 months to get a decision, he said.
Olympia President Kevin Mahaney said his firm didn't want to spend what would likely amount to several million dollars on the project while the title remained in question.
"It's a question of risk for us," Mahaney said. "Our legal team has advised us we have significant risk going forward with this project."
The issue came to a head as the city attempted to work with the state to secure clear title to the submerged land. An Oct. 14 letter from Maine Attorney General Steven Rowe indicated that his office had reviewed the facts surrounding the property and didn't believe the city had clear ownership.
A spokesman for the office declined to comment Thursday on the city's stated plans to sue.
The state would give only a 30-year lease for the underwater property, but Olympia contended that such a short time frame would make it challenging to secure financing for the project. The developer had sought a 75-year lease from the city to give it sufficient time to recover its costs and earn a return on its investment.
But Mahaney said Thursday that the breakdown, which prompted a City Council subcommittee to vote unanimously Wednesday night to scuttle the deal, has "nothing to do with financing."
James Broder, an attorney hired by the city for the negotiations, said the submerged-land issue was part of talks with Olympia as early as January. The city got a title insurance commitment, with a national firm agreeing that if Olympia closed on a loan, it would have a $40 million indemnity policy if the state were to successfully claim the land.
As negotiations proceeded, that assurance wasn't enough for Olympia, Broder said.
According to Leeman, the city has spent roughly $100,000 on negotiation legal fees and other expenses related to the project. Mahaney said Olympia has invested more than $1 million to date.
Leeman noted that the work done to date has produced a fully developed master agreement and performance specifications that can be used going forward.
"The city is very, very well-armed to do whatever it chooses to do," Broder said. "Whoever the next entity to come forward is, we're going to be able to hand them a set of documents and say, 'Can you do it or not?' "
The new City Council will have several options, Leeman said, as the title issue is resolved. It can put the whole project back out to bid; it can give the project to Ocean Properties, which lost the bid to Olympia in 2007; it can sign the master development agreement with Olympia, with no work to be done until the title is resolved; or it could do nothing.
"It's still a project that's going to move forward. We're just uncertain as to how it's going to move forward," Leeman said.
Ocean Properties is still interested in the project, said developer Robert Baldacci, the brother of Gov. John Baldacci.
"It's up to the...
Reader comments
Click here to view or add comments on this story
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form