Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Bill targets predatory lending practices
By EDWARD D. MURPHY, Staff Writer Portland Press Herald Tuesday, May 1, 2007

2007 Press Herald file
2007 Press Herald file
Donna Gillette, a victim of predatory lending practices, appeared at Monday's news conference.
Mortgage brokers would be subject to significant restrictions under a proposal introduced in the Maine Legislature Monday designed to crack down on predatory lending practices.
The bill, backed by House Speaker Glenn Cummings, D-Portland, and Sen. Dana Dow, R-Waldoboro, would limit the fees lenders can collect on a loan; ban mortgage clauses that restrict a borrower's ability to go to court; require greater disclosure on loan documents; and toughen the penalties for violations while adding two new enforcement positions.
The bill has bipartisan co-sponsorship of more than 100 legislators and nearly 40 consumer, lending, religious and other organizations.
The proposal comes against a backdrop of rising foreclosure rates, both in Maine and nationally, and a wave of bankruptcies by several lenders who targeted borrowers with poor credit histories because they could charge higher interest rates.
One reason for the rising foreclosure rates is that many subprime loans offer interest rates that start off relatively low but are adjusted upward, often substantially, after about two years. Borrowers who had trouble making the payments under the low "teaser" rate are unable to make the higher monthly payments after the rates increase, and their ability to refinance has been limited by plateauing home values.
Maine's proposal would "go an awfully long way toward addressing the predatory lending abuses that have led us to this foreclosure crisis," said Uriah King, a policy associate with the Center for Responsible Lending, a national nonprofit group that focuses on homeownership and lending practices.
A key provision, King said, requires lenders to make sure a borrower has the ability to repay the loan, especially considering other costs that go along with home ownership, such as insurance and taxes. That calculation of the borrower's ability to keep up with the loan would be based on the higher interest rate that will be charged for most of the life of the loan, rather than the initial teaser rate, the proposal said.
That provision "actually supports homeownership and makes sure that it (the loan) doesn't become a noose around the heads of Maine families," King said.
The law would:
  • Ban the practice of "flipping" loans: repeated refinancings that pile up fees earned by mortgage brokers, but strip the homeowner of much of the equity in the house.
  • Reduce the ceiling on lenders' fees, from 8 percent of the total loan to 5 percent.
  • Require the lender to ensure that a borrower can repay the loan.
  • Add new provisions for subprime loans, such as requiring a borrower to speak with a financial counselor about the loan; banning prepayment penalties; barring payment increases that are more than double the initial payment; and prohibiting the practice of rolling loan fees into the mortgage.
  • Ban mortgage clauses that require a borrower to agree to binding arbitration in disputes with the lender and block the ability to go to court.
  • Toughen penalties for violations and create two new positions in the state Office of Consumer Credit Regulation to enforce the laws.
  • In a case cited at a State House news conference Monday, Donna Gillette said she sought to buy a house in Sanford for $165,000. Gillette said she was offered an adjustable-rate mortgage with no money down and a starting interest rate of 8 percent.
    But before closing, the banker tore up the loan agreement and said the interest rate would have to be 10 percent, she said. By the time a second lien loan and other fees were tacked on, the cost of the house had shot up to $188,000, which included $12,000 in settlement costs financed into the loan, said Gillette.
    Richard Hackett, a partner at Pierce Atwood who teaches banking law at Boston University, said some of the proposed law's provisions are warranted, but he said the bans on flipping loans and restricting fees may go too far.
    Hackett, who said he usually represents lenders in his practice, said the ban on flipping could make it difficult for borrowers to refinance a loan with their current lender. And the restriction on fees would put Maine chartered banks at a disadvantage compared to federally chartered institutions, which have an 8 percent limit.
    "It's creating a rigid set of rules, broadly applicable and creating an uneven playing field," he said.
    The Associated Press contributed to this story.
    Staff Writer Edward D. Murphy can be contacted at 791-6465 or at: emurphy@pressherald.com


    Reader comments

    Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

    Jake007 of Portland, ME
    May 1, 2007 6:49 AM
    Hey House Speaker Glenn Cummings, D-Portland, and Sen. Dana Dow, R-Waldoboro, how about a Bill to target predatory taxing practices...seems like that might affect a lot more Mainers...report abuse
    Dave of Portland, ME
    May 1, 2007 7:20 AM


    AMEN JAKE007

    Since when is it anyones responsibility for a loan, bad credit etc if you signed on the dotted line. It is your responsibility to read and understand a contract before you sign. Calling foul afterwards is bullsh&t!

    Mainers grow up and stop being such pathetic victims all the time. Legislators enough with the nanny sate mentality. Promote self reliance this bill should be called the "bill to protect idiots who are too stupid to read and understand something before signing." Predatory lending is crap noone made you sign on the dotted line.report abuse
    Greg Greg of Portland, ME
    May 1, 2007 7:31 AM
    The state won't look at this as a stupid borrowing problem instead of a predatory lending problem, because Augusta does a lot of stupid borrowing too! If Donna Gillette doesn't want to or can't afford to buy the house, that's not the lender's fault. What do you mean, a second lien loan "tacked in" and settlement costs of 12,000? Those are seller costs not buyer costs. Presumably the sellers were also stupid borrowers and had multiple mortgages that exceeded their sale price, but that does not require the buyer to satisfy the seller's debt. There are no victim here. Just people who seem to think they're entitled. Oh, this is Maine? Nevermind. report abuse
    jd3 of Boston, MA
    May 1, 2007 7:32 AM
    Forget about predatory language in promissory notes and mortgages - the problem originates at the source - mortgage brokers. I will not generalize and say all mortgage brokers are scumbags: but there are many who are. People do not realize that when they go to get a loan, the broker is looking out for *himself* and his *commission*. In the end, he doesn't care if you can or cannot actually afford the mortgage he is getting you, he only wants his commission before he moves on to the next customer.

    It is true that the buck stops with the person who signs on the dotted line. But those who are peddling these "deals" should be held more accountable.

    I have seen too many foreclosures in the past 2 years .. people are biting off more than they can chew, and many of them are not aptly warned by the broker.

    report abuse

    Show all 31 comments

    You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.