Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Critics not swayed by new Plum Creek plan
From staff and news services Portland Press Herald Saturday, April 28, 2007

Plum Creek Timber Co. introduced its latest plan on Friday for what would be northern Maine's largest development project.
The company's revised proposal for the Moosehead Lake region calls for fewer waterfront lots and more donated conservation land. It also would increase the amount of land zoned for development and the number of resort accommodations that could be built near the western shore of Moosehead.
The plan, submitted to the state's Land Use Regulation Commission, is the second revision that Plum Creek has made since it first proposed the massive development two years ago.
The Seattle-based company, one of the largest timberland owners in Maine and the country, has focused attention on the value and the future of Maine's 10 million-acre North Woods.
The revised plan still includes 975 house lots and two resorts, but the revisions would reduce shoreline development on Moosehead Lake and nearby ponds and lakes by 40 percent, said Luke Muzzy, Plum Creek's senior land asset manager.
The plan probably will meet some opposition, Muzzy said, but it also should ease concerns.
"We're not going to make everybody happy, on both sides," he said. "I hear all the time from some people saying there shouldn't be anything up here, and other people saying we should be able to do more development down the road."
Jym St. Pierre, Maine director of RESTORE: The North Woods, said the plan would double the amount of land on which the project would be developed, from about 10,000 acres to more than 20,000.
It also proposes to increase, from 500 to 800, the number of housing units -- houses, condominiums or hotel rooms -- allowable in the project's Big Moose Mountain resort.
While the plan contains improvements from the previous one, it's still out of scale for the region, St. Pierre said.
"What they're saying is, 'We've made improvements, so you should be happy,'" he said. "If you're hitting your head against the wall 100 times and then hitting your head against the wall only 80 times, I guess that's an improvement."
From the start, the plan has been opposed by environmental groups that say the development would be inappropriate for the largest undeveloped tract east of the Mississippi River.
The plan is the largest subdivision ever proposed in Maine.
Cathy Johnson, North Woods project manager for the Natural Resources Council of Maine, said the new plan has some positive elements, such as moving some lots closer to the populated area of Greenville and dropping plans to develop house lots on a number of lakes and ponds.
However, Plum Creek's intention to develop a resort on Moosehead Lake's Lily Bay and house lots on the shores of Long Pond, 15 miles to the west, still troubles her.
"Our overall goal is to make sure the beauty and character of the spectacular Moosehead Lake region are not destroyed by Plum Creek's proposed development," Johnson said.
The new plan will be reviewed by the Land Use Regulation Commission, which oversees development in the state's unorganized territories.
The first possible date for the start of public hearings is Oct. 29, according to the commission.
Regarding land conservation, Plum Creek is proposing to increase the amount of land it puts into conservation from 70,000 to 90,000 acres once the plan is approved, Muzzy said.
It also plans to sell conservation easements and land totaling 341,000 acres to The Nature Conservancy and other groups.
If approved, it would be the second-largest conservation easement in U.S. history, Plum Creek said.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 13 comments:

Sean Birkel of Orono, ME
May 1, 2007 7:56 PM
Chris from Portland (4/28/07) asserts wrongly that Moosehead Lake is not part of the North Woods.

In fact, the North Woods is a broad region of transition forest between the softwoods of boreal Canada and the hardwoods of southern Appalachia. It spans west to east from Minnesota to New Brunswick and encompasses all of the Maine industrial forest.

Confusion arises because Mainers tend to use "North Woods" in reference to the Unorganized Territories. In case you are not up to speed in Maine geography, the Unorganized Territories are unincorporated townships that occupy approximately half of the state. These are areas of land that were originally intended for Euro-American settlement, but through a twist of economy-driven fate became timberlands instead of towns and cities.

Another complicating factor is that within the Unorganized Territories is the "North Maine Woods," a multiple-use zone of timberland managed cooperatively between timberland owners and state natural resource agencies.

The debated Plum Creek land surrounding Moosehead Lake does not fall under the auspices of the "North Maine Woods." However, in the geographical ecological and historical sense, this region is, in fact, part of the eastern North American "North Woods."

Also, one should understand that there is not any "pristine wilderness" in Maine. It is all industrial forest, save for Baxter State Park (reclaimed land) and a few small enclaves of true Old Growth. The Allagash has a narrow no-harvest buffer separating the river from otherwise road-dissected timberland. Hardly pristine.

Regardless, open this quasi-wilderness up to development and in fifty years northern Maine will look like Massachusetts.

If you like houses and people everywhere, why not move to Massachusetts? They are developing themselves into oblivion - you can help them along!report abuse
Toni Seger of Lovell, ME
Apr 29, 2007 12:28 PM
Has anyone in this discussion ever heard of Evergreen Valley? Maine's worst White Elephant was supposed to be family friendly development that brought jobs and prosperity to western Maine. I've lived on the edge of EV for 30 years. It was sold with lies and every attempt at development has been a disaster built on more lies. I see EV's repetition in Plum Creek multiplied a thousand times.

"Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are destined to repeat them."
George Santayanareport abuse
Seth of Gorham, ME
Apr 28, 2007 9:36 PM
Mary Hilton like Jeff Mu is another left wing environmentalist wacko. Probably laid in the middle of the road in the Maine Yankee days. report abuse
Seth of Gorham, ME
Apr 28, 2007 9:32 PM
I suspect that Jeff Mu is employed by MoveOn.Org, that he thinks that Al Gore is not fat, and all the polar bears left on earth are stranded on a single ice flow headed for Thailand. Jeff Mu is no doubt a Moonbat. Has Jeff Mu actually been out of Portland, Maine? Has Jeff Mu driven through Washington County or Aroostook County? I doubt it. report abuse
Maine Commenter of Portland, ME
Apr 28, 2007 6:24 PM
Mary, what is it about the ratio of 99/1 (conservation easements to development) that brings you to say its "large-scale destruction"? Another RESTORE hyberbole.
report abuse
Steve Cassidy of Westbrook, ME
Apr 28, 2007 2:29 PM
Owner's rights plus state's guidelines equal fair process. Obstructionist's beware! The nay sayer's need to clear their heads and realize truth.
There are two Maines! North and South. We are too few people for such high taxes! We don't have a lot of money but there are quite valuable assets! The state needs to invest some of these where the most long term good will be done!
The opportunity here for controlled growth towards a tourist based sports and nature destination is incredible. Stop bickering and start planning what could be the best damed overall recreational destination program on the face of the earth!!!
Is there no foresight out there?
A geographically central location serving campers, hikers, boaters, skiers, hunters, fishers, swimmers, snowmobilers, on and on...
Fly in, drive in, train in, walk in....
Untold job opportunities in all the rec fields, real estate, building trades, transportation, management, enforcement.
We have a willing participnt to start the ball rolling.
Where is the state leadership to pick this up and run with it???
Where is the next Governor Baxter?
Is this Seward's folley? The Louisianna Purchase? This can be enormously successful given careful planning that realizes this area in question is only the first drop in the bucket of a much larger plan that hasn't surfaced yet!

Come on people, Lead, Follow or get out of the way!!!report abuse
paul blick of portland, ME
Apr 28, 2007 2:07 PM
george smith and the sportsmens alliance should be ashamed of themselves. there's no place for a monstrosity like plum creek in maine.

report abuse
Mark of Casco, ME
Apr 28, 2007 12:00 PM
I am as big a fan of the beautiful North Woods as anyone and would love to see them preserved, but why should Plum Creek be penalized because they happen own large tracts of undeveloped land in a beautiful spot? If you or I owned a parcel of land, wouldn't we expect to have basic control of what happens on it without the State dictating terms to us?

For those who expect the State to require the land be preserved in its pristine condition forever, I suggest you put all your money in your trunk, drive up to Augusta, and drop it off at the Statehouse. The only fair way for the State to keep Plum Creek from doing as they please (within the law) on their own land is to buy it from them. report abuse
_Christopher of Portland, ME
Apr 28, 2007 10:40 AM
I agree that these groups will never be satisfied. I do not see any reason not to proceed with this planned development that will be good for the Maine economy.

This is not the NORTH WOODS. If you want some pristine wilderness check out the Allagash Wilderness Waterway which is in fact in the North Woods. The argument that this is destroying the Maine wilderness is nonsense. Why don't you take a drive (or hike) around Maine and see how much vast wilderness we really have.report abuse
Bob of Scarborough, ME
Apr 28, 2007 8:06 AM

Excuse me folks "the Maine citizens" do not own this land. We have systems in place to protect this land. Mind your own business and let land owners improve "their" land anyway they want, according to the law.............And for those who want to break the law and burn or vandalize someone else's property............It's time to "lock and load"! report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.