Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram
Maine gets an 'F' from child advocacy group
By DAVID CRARY, Associated Press © Copyright 2007 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Tuesday, April 24, 2007

STATE RANKINGS
The grades assigned by First Star, a Washington-based child advocacy group, in a report assessing state laws regarding legal representation for children in abuse and neglect proceedings:

A: Connecticut, Louisiana, Mississippi, New York, West Virginia

B: Arizona, Arkansas, District of Columbia, Georgia, Kansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia

C: California, Colorado, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Wyoming

D: Alabama, Iowa, Kentucky, Montana, Oregon, Wisconsin

F: Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Washington

NEW YORK - Maine is among 15 states that get failing grades on a first-of-its-kind report card assessing the legal representation provided to abused and neglected children as courts make decisions about whether to separate them from their families.
The report, to be released today by the Washington-based child advocacy group First Star, is sharply critical of states that do not require all children in the proceedings to have their own attorneys. Maine uses trained, court-appointed volunteer advocates.
The report says more states should join the 17 that require lawyers to represent children's expressed wishes and ensure that those preferences are heard in court.
"The family of a child can be created and or destroyed based on the determination by the court," the report says. "And too often, the child, although most impacted by the court, has the least amount of input."
Since 1974, Congress has required states to appoint representatives -- often known as guardians ad litem -- for children in abuse and neglect proceedings. However, states have interpreted the federal law in varying ways. The First Star report says 16 do not have statutes requiring that children be represented by their own attorneys in all child-protection proceedings.
"If you or I have a traffic accident, we can hire an attorney to represent our interests," said First Star's chief executive, Deborah Sams. "If a child has been the victim of abuse and neglect, they deserve the same right."
The report based grades on several criteria, most importantly whether legal counsel for children is mandatory and whether the attorneys are required to advocate for the children's expressed wishes. Other criteria included requiring specialized training in child-advocacy law, the attorneys' ethical responsibilities, and the children's right to attend key court hearings.
The 15 states receiving an "F" were Alaska, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota and Washington.
Whytni Frederick, a First Star lawyer who was the principal investigator for the report, said the grades were based on state laws, not on day-to-day practices by state courts and agencies. For example, Rhode Island got a low grade in part because its statute does not specify that the child's representative must be an attorney. But Family Court Chief Judge Jeremiah S. Jeremiah Jr. said the court's ongoing policy is to appoint attorneys.
In several other states, children are routinely represented by non-attorneys, often volunteers from a nationwide program called Court Appointed Special Advocates. The advocates are widely praised for their dedication, and frequently spend more hours with children than attorneys could spare, but they often lack legal expertise.
"The court system has become increasingly complex," said Paul D'Agostino, executive director of the Child Abuse Council in Tampa, Fla. "It's important the child has representation that is very knowledgeable and sophisticated."
Maine officials spoke highly of the work done by the volunteer advocates. The Department of Health and Human Services contends its court-appointed special advocates are well-trained and passionate.
"We don't share that criticism that some may have of using non-attorney guardian ad litems," said Linda Brissette, a children services program specialist with the DHHS.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Edwyn thrash of portland, ME
Apr 24, 2007 8:06 PM
Not and insult Jen just fact..If and organization has no legal prowless they are indeed rudderless. Not unlike surpressed memory syndrome most of the time it never happend but the person is convinced it did.Now one does not need a law degree to act in the best interest of a child but if your going to start yapping about which is best and worst you best have some educational mettle to say such. Personally I do not recognize their authority or their skill after reading the article I see alot of lack ofs.
The only grade I see is one the organization should have, F as in foolish or flawed or foulreport abuse
Jen1272 of Ellsworth, ME
Apr 24, 2007 11:41 AM
My father-in-law is a CASA volunteer, and he spends quite a bit of his time working with the children and their families/foster families. He gets to know the children and their situation, and is trained to sort through all the facts to make a well-informed decision that is best for the child. CASA volunteers are also available to testify in court, on behalf of the children. They do represent the child, their wishes, and their best interests. To basically say that because they don't have a law degree, they aren't advocating for children is an insult. What makes these idiots think that lawyers have the time or inclination to do the work that these volunteers do, and for the same amount of money(which, by the way is ZERO)?report abuse
Kevin Beling of Cape Elizabeth, ME
Apr 24, 2007 11:29 AM
If these volunteers are better than lawyers, I'll take an 'F' anyday. What is the point of this article? It sounds like this grade is not based off actual results at all, just whether the laws meet a predefined criteria that has no bearing on the actual treatment of the child in court.report abuse
Frank Rier of Jay, ME
Apr 24, 2007 10:29 AM
Another full employment act for lawyers. These jack-asses are more interested in promoting their own agenda than protecting children. I've never met a lawyer yet that didn't set the stop watch for his/her hourly pay at the handshake. With kids it takes more time and patience to get them to open up and really understand their emotional needs. We're doing it right now. Lawyers aren't adept at assessing emotional needs and they would bill the State millions trying. Our kids get an A for our efforts on their behalf now; hopefully gibberish of this low calibre won't find a forum in Augusta.report abuse

Show all 12 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.