Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
On Environment Blog Index
April 27, 2007
UMaine gears up to go climate neutral

Yahoo did it. So did the presidential campaigns of John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

Even Norway and Sweden did it. (Europe, not Oxford County.)

Now the University of Maine System, or nearly all of it, has taken the pledge to try to eliminate its contribution to global warming.

The goal is called becoming climate neutral or carbon neutral, because scientists say carbon dioxide emissions are the primary way college campuses, businesses, countries and the rest of us are doing our part to heat up the atmosphere.

Colleges around the country are joining the trend as part of the whole “green campus” movement. They say their efforts reflect the schools’ role in society and their responsibility to the young people they serve.

It’s also a point of competition for the schools to present the greenest reputation to prospective students and alumni.

Dudley Greeley, the sustainability office director at the University of Southern Maine, said Maine’s was one of the first state university systems to sign the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment. Actually, the presidents of the system’s largest six campuses have signed. The Augusta campus hasn’t made the list yet. One of the signers is USM President Richard Pattenaude, the man who soon will be chancellor of the whole system and who is a strong supporter of the sustainability movement.

Maine’s first school to join the neutrality quest was the College of the Atlantic in Bar Harbor. President David Hales made the pledge publicly last fall.

Also signed onto the Climate Commitment in Maine are Bates and Unity colleges. Bowdoin and Colby, though not officially signed on, have active sustainability programs.

The formal pledge doesn’t come with a deadline for achieving climate neutrality. It does set interim deadlines to meet along the way: Complete an emissions inventory within one year and, within two, create a detailed plan and set a target date for reaching the goal.

Schools have begun by building more energy-efficient buildings, encouraging public transportation, buying power from renewable energy and making other changes.

Energy efficiency and public transportation seem innocent enough, right? There is some controversy around the whole climate-neutral trend, however.

That’s because it’s impossible at this point for a school or a business to produce no carbon dioxide. Employees and students drive cars and fly in airplanes, to name a couple reasons.

A theoretical zero impact requires buying offsets, which are payments to remove an equivalent amount of carbon from the atmosphere somewhere else in the world by planting trees, building windmills or something like that.

Offsets have gotten a lot of scrutiny and criticism because they’re unregulated and somewhat risky. Many also see them as an indulgence or a way to avoid real emissions reductions.

According to Greeley, the campus pledge initiative limits the use of offsets to a fraction of the other reductions that schools have to make. Neutrality, for now, is simply a goal.

So prospective college students now have another question to ask: Is the campus going climate-neutral? If the reply is to go ahead and open a window, that would be a “no.”

Posted by at 10:51 PM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

Here we go again, no real solutions.

There wasn't ONE mention of solar energy in the whole article. I've got news for you people, building energy efficient buildings IS NOTHING new!

I find it so amazing that people like John Richardson think carbon credits are some sort of new efficient / effective environmental solution.

Carbon credits ARE NOT an environmental solution, but a new form of GLOBAL TAX or what I prefer to call GLOBAL SLAVERY.

Carbon credits can’t produce any form of alternative energy, yet solar power CAN. We have had access to a clean energy source that has been around since the creation of our solar system. I’m 39 and I remember my 1st grade teacher talking about solar power.

That is well over 30 years and we still don’t have wide use of solar energy! We’re still using fossil fuels to heat our homes, run our vehicles, generate electricity, and more. We turn down wind farms because some people are afraid of offending some hikers on the Appalachian Trail. One would think people like John Richardson would be out on the front lines fighting for technology advancements in solar power.

I’m not afraid of Global Warming, I’m more afraid of America falling into slavery under a false cause. I’m just asking people to stop and think for a moment. Get away from the TV, radio, internet, newspaper, all the Global Warming hype, to think for yourself and start asking questions.

The fossil fuel tycoons and the federal government WILL NEVER allow us to develop and fully implement alternative energy sources.

I’m going to say this again.

The fossil fuel tycoons and the federal government WILL NEVER allow us to develop and fully implement alternative energy sources.

Why?

Because they stand to loose too much money.

So what kind of solutions are we given for global warming: Inflate our tires, carbon credits, hybred automobiles that you have to drive for 5 years just to compensate for the amount of carbon released just to make the battery, light bulbs that contain mercury that will eventually find its way into the ground water and the proposal to use only 1 square when wiping our butts.

I just hope all you people wash up when you done.

Posted by Eric Emery
April 29, 2007 11:02 AM

Wow, what a surprise...the liberal elite at Maine's colleges and university system have rolled over on the intellectual fraud that mankind causes global warming and so we, in all our arrogance, can reverse it. Unbeleiveable! But then again, with all the grant money that becomes available for anything to do with climate change, I shouldn't be so surprised.

Posted by Jeff
April 30, 2007 09:53 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index

John covers environmental issues for the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. A reporter for 20 years, he always hoped to find some use for his undergraduate degree in International Environmental Studies. He also has a master's degree in journalism, though back then they taught writing on a thing called a typewriter. He's married and has two children.

About this blog

Down To Earth is a place to keep tabs on the environment beat at the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. Staff Writer John Richardson will post updates on past news stories, share tidbits and behind-the-story stories, answer questions and get feedback and ideas from you.



Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe
Most Recent Comments
Seeing 'ghosts' in the Maine woods (5)
Shellie wrote: Beedlerd, We have had three sightings here on the midcoast of maine last fa...

Coastal communities serious about reducing pesticides (2)
Ron Huber wrote: Another important reason to sharply reduce coastal pesticide use is to prot...

Endangered: Staffing cuts threaten Maine’s wildlife refuges (1)
Virtual Pet wrote: Sorry to hear that there are budget cuts. Wildlife preservation is such an...

Making you think before you flush (1)
the dude wrote: And to think the state is giving a compost operation a hard time for causin...

Group wants to raise profile of storm water (1)
David Mann wrote: In a perfect world, excess storm water and runoff that can't be handled by ...

Could Maine follow China in plastic bag backlash? (6)
David Mann wrote: My hat goes off to Hannaford Bros. for promoting cloth bags. They are avail...