On Environment Blog Index
April 07, 2007
Warming news both global, local

The science and politics of a shifting global climate just keep heating up.

On Monday, the Supreme Court weighed in with a big global warming ruling, and on Friday experts from 130 countries gave a sobering report in Brussels about how the changes will, and already are, affecting the planet. Here in Maine, meanwhile, state government is making some climate news of its own.

You didn’t think a snowstorm in April would make all this global warming talk go away, did you?

In case you missed it, the Supreme Court decided that carbon dioxide is a pollutant under federal law and can be regulated because it traps heat around the earth. That could open the door to a range of federal efforts to keep the global temperature down.

Maine and 11 other states were on the prevailing side in the case, arguing for national limits on CO2 from car and truck tailpipes.

Maine, in fact, has already told automakers that they must sell more fuel efficient cars here, starting next year, to reduce emissions. That’s the focus of its own legal battle, and lawyers say the Supreme Court just handed this state and others some timely legal firepower.

The latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, meanwhile, says many of the harshest effects of a warming planet will happen far from here and hit the world’s poorest people.

It projects mass extinctions of species, expanding deserts and hunger in Africa, thawing in the Himalayas and lack of drinking water in Asia, and sea level rise and coastal flooding, especially of low-lying coasts and islands in southern Asia.
Heat waves and droughts in southern Europe and the American southwest also are projected.

Northern regions, the report points out, will see more of the positive short-term changes. It projects more rainfall and longer growing seasons in high latitudes, opening Arctic seaways, and reduced deaths from cold.

At the same time, Maine is not immune to coastal flooding, and longer, warmer summers won’t be good news for everyone, like, say, the ski industry.

The report also confirms a relatively new concern for this part of the world. The buildup of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is making oceans more acidic, especially colder oceans, it says.

That could disrupt the bottom of the ocean food chain, the one that provides us with fresh seafood.

Before the dust settles from this week’s global warming news, and maybe even before all the snow melts from this week’s storm, look for the Legislature and Governor to get into the act.

Baldacci’s plan to set limits on carbon dioxide emissions from power plants is expected to be formally presented to lawmakers next week. Final language was still being sorted out Friday after more than a month of intensive haggling with industry and environmental representatives.

The Maine plan won’t spare Africa from famine or keep Bangladesh above sea level. But, if lawmakers agree to it, the state would join others in the northeast to create the nation’s first Kyoto-style attempt to fight global warming.

Posted by at 07:28 AM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

Until Mainers can see visible evidence of global warming....a palpable sea rise beyond that of the last 140 years; an end to this unusual cold wave that has gripped the nation and Maine until the end of next week; a real commitment by liberal environmentalists to do more than shift the blame for their own excessive energy consumption to others and exsponge their guilt by 'carbon trading'; and an end to the biblical prophecies of famine and drought they will continue to enjoy the benefits of a changing climate and continue to live a lifestyle that conserves energy and is sustainable.

We are not quite ready to accept Lord Gore as our saviour, no matter how many times he rises into the sky to save us from his own excess!

Posted by fjh
April 8, 2007 07:27 AM

"That could disrupt the bottom of the ocean food chain, the one that provides us with fresh seafood."
---
With all respect to Mr. Richardson, does he really think PPH readers have to be told that seafood comes from the ocean ?

If the ocean becomes acidic, plankton cannot build bodies of calcium carbonate. No plankton = No ocean life period.

Please, Mr. Richardson. This is not about whether PPH readers can get "fresh seafood" at the store.

Posted by
April 8, 2007 11:09 PM

**********NEWSFLASH**********

The theory that global warming is caused by CO2 has been proven wrong. Apparently the "scientists" mixed up their data that showed that higher global temperatures followed higher CO2 concentrations when the exact opposite is true.

Remarkably, the climate "scientists" failed to put the readings, measured historically in arctic ice samples, on a time line. When real scientists without an axe to grind or a grant to win performed the proper test, it clearly showed that CO2 concentrations followed temperature. Additionally, it has been shown that the earth itself, particularly the vast oceans, emits CO2 when warming and collects CO2 when cooling.

I urge everyone to watch the very thorough and scientifically correct documentary, "The Great Global Warming Swindle". Learn why the global warming alarmists have socio-political reasons for initiating such fear-mongering among American citizens and panic-driven draconian measures by our government to cut our prosperity and standard of living down to size.

Sorry, we ain't buying it. Global warming is caused by sunspot activity and is also historically documented. What we should be asking is how these charlatans have been given so much power in the first place, and how we can diminish their influence now that an entire industry has been created around their false claims.

Posted by Dick
April 9, 2007 08:10 AM

Global warming news flashes are truly annoying me because the story is being swished around from one political stance to another yet no one is really fessing up to the true meaning of global warming.
Obviously the earth is intended to survive off its own cultivated produces and reepings. It was created to recycle back into what it sowed. Mother nature never knew she was going to be gagged with the industrial skyscrappers, nuclear palnts that ommit toxic gases, how abotu those large trucks that spew out black exhaust, enormous amounts of trash and plastic from our consumptuous society, and not to mention every possible chemical we use to do our hair, clean our cars and homes, etc. I think that the issue is how the humans on earth are destroying earth by dumping to much products that cannot be dissinergrated back into the earth. We've created polluted rain that cannot nourish the plant life like it use to, and well the fish are tasting our pollution too. Our waste is recycling back into to what we consume. Obviously that's going to effect the whole ecological system because it was never intended to filter out all the plastic and rubbish we have made in it. I just think we're not taking care of what needs to be taking care of..mass consumption of non biodegradable products. They do not just dissapear!

Posted by caroline
April 9, 2007 12:46 PM

Thank you Mr. Richardson (saw you at the State House last Wednesday) for a good overview.

The only people who "doubt" global climate change also "doubt" biological evolution and the empirical scientific method itself. This is an unfortunate consequence of poor science teaching and poor science curricula in many schools. Note to Dick: there was also a TV show that said the Apollo moon landing never happened.

Posted by Douglas Watts
April 9, 2007 05:21 PM

Proven by whom Dick??

Posted by cici
April 10, 2007 06:59 AM

How ironic that Doug will talk about those who doubt evolution, let's call them Christians, while espousing his own religious faith that predicts the end of the world, let's call them Global Warming Alarmists.

I hope to see people like Doug with their sandwichboard signs saying "REPENT FOR THE END IS NEAR", walking up and down the sidewalk, but first things first; lets get a law passed to stop the denial of global warming. In the fight for our planet, sometimes people have to give up certain inalienable rights, which seems fair since millions in develping countries will be giving up their lives as we struggle to save the planet.

I call it justifiable homocide, eh Doug?

Posted by Dick
April 10, 2007 09:25 AM

These global warming alarmists are really tiring...it's time that folks used their brains instead of their "feelings" when it comes to concluding that mankind can play any reversal role in temperature change. As Dick points out in his recommendation of "The Great Global Warming Swindle" (a BBC documentary), scientific FACTS and EVIDENCE, completely contradict the foundation of the AL Gore & Co. THEORY that increases in the levels of CO2 account for temperature changes, IT JUST ISN'T SUPPORTED BY THE SCIENCE, FOLKS.
Arguing that particulate emmissions (pollution) from our dependency on fossil fuels is bad is one thing and one that reasonable people can probably agree upon...but to accept and promote a theory that is based entirely on fallacious reasoning and a lack of supporting science for the sake of advancing a political/socio-economic agenda is patently WRONG. Unfortunately Dick, the GW alarmists are so heavily invested in their thinking that they will reject any suggestion or potential for this BBC documentary and the evidence that it presents to illustrate a countervailing position. If they watched it, they'd be surprised to learn of GreenPeace's co-founder's position on the GW fable.

Posted by Jeff
April 10, 2007 12:54 PM

...you alarmists might also learn something (oooppss, you don't want to do that!) from reading Michael Crichton's speeches on the politics of the global warming religion. Just Google for his web site.

Posted by Jeff
April 10, 2007 01:01 PM

One would think that if Al Gore and his followers were intellectually honest with themselves they would completely give up their private jets, mansions, limousines, summer homes and cars. That would set a good example for us simple people who don't know any better and need the government to tell us how to live. Maybe it's all about just an excuse to raise our taxes, to create more regulations and layers of bureaucracy and to ultimately erode the sovereignty of the United States.

Posted by Comso
April 11, 2007 11:48 AM

I am wondering if John Richardson would be willing to totally give up his vehicle? People might take the global warming crowd a bit more seriously if he and others would do this.

Posted by Andrew
April 11, 2007 11:52 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index

John covers environmental issues for the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. A reporter for 20 years, he always hoped to find some use for his undergraduate degree in International Environmental Studies. He also has a master's degree in journalism, though back then they taught writing on a thing called a typewriter. He's married and has two children.

About this blog

Down To Earth is a place to keep tabs on the environment beat at the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. Staff Writer John Richardson will post updates on past news stories, share tidbits and behind-the-story stories, answer questions and get feedback and ideas from you.



Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe
Most Recent Comments
Seeing 'ghosts' in the Maine woods (5)
Shellie wrote: Beedlerd, We have had three sightings here on the midcoast of maine last fa...

Coastal communities serious about reducing pesticides (2)
Ron Huber wrote: Another important reason to sharply reduce coastal pesticide use is to prot...

Endangered: Staffing cuts threaten Maine’s wildlife refuges (1)
Virtual Pet wrote: Sorry to hear that there are budget cuts. Wildlife preservation is such an...

Making you think before you flush (1)
the dude wrote: And to think the state is giving a compost operation a hard time for causin...

Group wants to raise profile of storm water (1)
David Mann wrote: In a perfect world, excess storm water and runoff that can't be handled by ...

Could Maine follow China in plastic bag backlash? (6)
David Mann wrote: My hat goes off to Hannaford Bros. for promoting cloth bags. They are avail...