On Environment Blog Index
March 31, 2007
Trash confusion got you down?

It has never been so complicated to take out the trash. And, for a lot of people, never so frustrating, either.

Yes, during World War II folks recycled tin foil, rubber, kitchen grease and other stuff. (That may help explain why people over 70 tend to be the best recyclers.)

But the Greatest Generation never had to sort their universal waste from their e-waste, or sit in line at a once-a-year household hazardous waste collection day to get rid of a can of paint thinner.

And they didn’t deal with the mixed messages sometimes coming from government these days: Don’t throw that TV or fluorescent light bulb in the trash, but good luck figuring out how to get rid of it. And if you do figure it out, take your checkbook – it could cost you.

Maine has some of the most progressive recycling programs in the nation, and Mainers have proven they want to do the right thing with their garbage.

The state’s bottle redemption law, approved by voters and implemented in 1978, is one of the oldest in the United States and is still one of the broadest. And Maine was the first state to create cost-sharing systems for recycling mercury thermostats and TVs and computer monitors that contain lead, cadmium and mercury.

All that is nice if you live in Portland or in Bridgton, where you can drop off regulated trash in town when it’s convenient. If you want to get rid of a TV in South Portland or Windham, on the other hand, you’ll have to take it to a recycler in the next town over, and you may have to pay a little extra.

It makes you wonder how many people are deciding not to bother, and what is really happening with those TVs and cans of paint thinner.

The confusion in Maine, unlike in some neighboring states, is partly a result of having about 500 different sets of rules – one for each town. Either you’re lucky enough to live in a community that makes it easy, or you really have to care. A lot.

The frustration is obvious every time we write a story about Maine recycling laws and readers ask, or sometimes plead, for help.

The only advice for now is to check with your town’s transfer station. Someone there should at least be able to tell you what doesn’t belong in your trash and where it does belong.

Also, Portland’s Recycling Center on Riverside Street is open to non-residents, and it’s generally cheaper than the commercial recycling alternatives.

Look here and here for state web pages on hazardous and universal waste disposal. And here is a listing of greater Portland collection programs posted by ecomaine.

In the meantime, we’d like to hear your recycling stories. And send us your nominations for Maine’s best and worst trash towns.

Posted by at 07:39 AM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

After several monthes of using the new single bag system in Brunswick, I have a few observations:

>>Garbage tends to get stuffed in the bags until you get to the weight limits...a 60 lb. bag will burst open long before you get 60 lbs. in it and a lot of stuff remains in the bag a lot longer before you take it outside.

>>washing recyclables seems odd but most plastic and glass container have food residue that must be rinsed off...and it isn't even insect season yet. Paper bags...which you have to ask for now, pile up on the porch.

NO-ONE wants plastic bags in the Waste stream and that's gonna eventually cost us more money at the market.

>>Have mixed emotions about having what is becoming a private monopoly receive all the 'single bags' for processing in their seperator in Auburn, Mass; esp. after getting a guided tour of the place in early March.

Once Brunswick closes its landfill, this will be the ONLY option left.

>>I miss dump picking for home projects..This is the ultimate recycling since it recycles all kinds of stuff that is now landfilled or burnt in a biomass boiler.

Perhaps it's a giant conspiracy instigated by HOME DEPOT to only buy new house parts in large quantities----resulted in even greater piles of unneeded things cluttering the basement and garage waiting for yet another government program to 'recycle' them ~sighs again~

Posted by frank j. heller
March 31, 2007 09:00 AM

Like Frank, I also live in Brunswick. I think the program has been great! It's single stream, so there's no separating cans, glass, paper, cardboard, paperboard, etc. Also, our household uses the smaller bags (no unit price difference from the larger ones), so we've never contended with trying to get 60 pounds into one bag.

Frank, here's a fix that works for us most of the time for rinsing plastic. Before you get rid of the container's cap, fill the container part way with water (and a drop or two of dish soap if necessary). Put the cap back on, shake the container, then empty. That usually does the trick. We've done this in other places we have lived and we never had an insect problem.

Posted by Marc
March 31, 2007 02:41 PM

I live in Portland and my husband and I only recycle papers and cardboard through the Portland recycling system. Everything else we take to Falmouth and drop it off. The person picking up recycling apparently took a dislike to us and refused to pick up the recyclables. We noticed that very few of our neighbors were separating their recyclables but we were. Apparently, he didn't like it.

Posted by Helene
March 31, 2007 07:17 PM

I find it ironic at best to see an environment reporter write--with a straight face--about the "frustration" of recyling. We have and use more stuff and junk and packaging than any society in the history of the world, yet it's too hard for us to get rid of it responsibly? Give me a break.

Posted by Educator
April 1, 2007 08:18 AM

I live in Lisbon and I have to say we have a great recycling system. Its easy and I feel good about the amount of things I can recycle. Of curse there are some fees but ther are low and worth it.

Posted by Dave
April 1, 2007 08:38 AM

Oh please..life isn't always easy.. recycle!

Posted by cici
April 2, 2007 06:42 AM

John is right, we need to make the system easier and more universal.

Posted by Bill Brasky
April 2, 2007 05:13 PM

I live in Windham and they only want certain things. So it makes it very difficult to make sure we are recycling properly. Also because they charge 12.50 for 5 bags you really have to limit what you throw away. They don't have a big trash day and when they open the transfer station up to get rid of the big stuff, they only take the same things they pick up in trash bags. Everything else you have to pay for. Where does my 12.50 go if it doesn't pay for me to be able to recycle everything that is recyclable....hmmmmm. something to think about.

Posted by Mary
April 2, 2007 06:38 PM

Going to Single Bag---a few additions for your home:
>>a seperated trash container, i.e. glass in one bin, metal in another, plastics in another.

>>an easily accessible, small composting container for organic kitchen waste.

>>a roller to roll up burnable newspaper and cardboard for fireplace starters.

Never get 60 lb bags...limit it to about 35 lbs.

Posted by Frank Heller
April 4, 2007 09:11 AM

Who are these people finding it difficult to recycle? I didn't grow up recycling (we only recycled soda bottles, for the 5 cent deposit), yet somehow I muster the capacity to rinse my containers and sort out my newspapers. Really, this isn't rocket science. I can understand not knowing where to bring your old computer or other outdated/broken electronics, but for anyone to feign confusion about how to recycle basic household waste is just plain lazy.

Posted by
April 5, 2007 08:15 AM

Didn't Lloyd Ferriss have a column with the same title. Did you thank him for the use of it?

Posted by Tim
April 6, 2007 04:04 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index

John covers environmental issues for the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. A reporter for 20 years, he always hoped to find some use for his undergraduate degree in International Environmental Studies. He also has a master's degree in journalism, though back then they taught writing on a thing called a typewriter. He's married and has two children.

About this blog

Down To Earth is a place to keep tabs on the environment beat at the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram. Staff Writer John Richardson will post updates on past news stories, share tidbits and behind-the-story stories, answer questions and get feedback and ideas from you.



Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe
Most Recent Comments
Seeing 'ghosts' in the Maine woods (5)
Shellie wrote: Beedlerd, We have had three sightings here on the midcoast of maine last fa...

Coastal communities serious about reducing pesticides (2)
Ron Huber wrote: Another important reason to sharply reduce coastal pesticide use is to prot...

Endangered: Staffing cuts threaten Maine’s wildlife refuges (1)
Virtual Pet wrote: Sorry to hear that there are budget cuts. Wildlife preservation is such an...

Making you think before you flush (1)
the dude wrote: And to think the state is giving a compost operation a hard time for causin...

Group wants to raise profile of storm water (1)
David Mann wrote: In a perfect world, excess storm water and runoff that can't be handled by ...

Could Maine follow China in plastic bag backlash? (6)
David Mann wrote: My hat goes off to Hannaford Bros. for promoting cloth bags. They are avail...