Political Extra Blog Index
March 18, 2008
Obama's speech on race

At a speech in Philadelphia today, Barack Obama will try to quash the furor over controversial remarks made by his pastor.

Below is the text of his speech, which his campaign sent to reporters minutes ago. Consider it a sneak-peak.

In short, Obama, who is running for the Democratic nomination, denounces remarks his pastor made blaming the United States for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and calling the United States the U.S.A. of KKK. He explains that what happens inside black churches is different than what happens inside white churches.

But the crux of the speech, which probably is too far down in the text, links the simmering anger felt among a generation of black men and women who grew up during segregation to the anger and resentment of working and middle-class white Americans.

Here is the key part of his speech that voters, the media and blogosphere must home in on for Obama to move past what has become a distraction to his campaign.

"But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naďve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election."

Posted at 10:48 AM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

It was a very good speech.

Only one of the three presidential candidates truly looks and sounds presidential: Barack Obama. McCain is a Bush clone and Hillary is resorting to divisive tactics to tear down her opponent as her campaign flounders. Only Obama is running a campaign that's above-board, inspiring and filled with the kind of ideas that can move us forward as a country.

Our nation is in serious need of a gransfusion of common sense, and common purpose. Barack Obama is the man to bring it on.

-

Posted by Bill in Portland
March 18, 2008 01:53 PM

It was a good speech by Obama in Phila, but did he have to publicly put off a response so he could carefully craft a response? Discrimination has been a problem in this country for years in this country of so many freedoms.

Other countries have greater imbalances of ethnic groups where minorities are more routinely persecuted, so overall America has done a good job of accepting the diversity in our society. Yes, we have some elitist cliques who often say anything and everything they know off the top of their heads and quite often their real knowledge is exposed in just a few minutes, having nothing more to say without repeating their previous words. It is only the extremist who pose such threats.

Obama missed an opportunity to show the kind of president he could be, thinking on his feet. Sadly, if he has to go into conference to formulate every answer, I'll have to choose someone else to resurrect our country out of another Bush wreck. We once went for a candidate because his dad was part of a great Presidential team. Sadly when he owned his own team, it was run with deception and arrogance. Fruit doesn't fall far from the tree. Need any more proof?

I recently listened to a woman who was asked what Obama has done for this country aside from his candidacy and she responded with What has Hillary done? What has McCain done? She never answered except to claim that the questioner was being "racist". IF she can't come up with something McCain has done, she is only interested in a sharp looking black man as president.

We need a leader, not a cheerleader with fine pulpit like words. If Obama or Oprah can't educate an audience to answer those questions, we need to look to someone else.

Posted by Larry W. Mayes
March 19, 2008 01:11 PM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?







Please enter the code as seen in the image above:



Blog Index





The Bloggers

dbradbury.jpg

Dieter Bradbury is the Press Herald's political correspondent. His career at the newspaper started in 1980, and includes 21 years as a reporter and seven as an editor. Bradbury is a graduate of the University of Southern Maine.


Updates
Sign up to be notified when there's a new entry
RSS
Subscribe
Most Recent Comments
Inauguration Notebook: Looking back on 72 hours and history (1)
julie seger wrote: Justin, You are so lucky! Great job! Julie...

The Inauguration: History overcome in an instant (3)
Paul wrote: Nicely done, Justin! Can't say I'm not a little jealous you were actually t...

Look Around: Photos from the inauguration (2)
Swan Pix wrote: Well it looks like Justin did all of the work for the team of four who cove...

LIVE BLOG: Election Night at Press Herald Plaza (12)
johnny wrote: pk1KN1 Thanks for good post...

The Campaign Fix: How are the candidates ending the race? (1)
Joe the Commenter wrote: The betting pool is at MainePolitics.net, it's just cross-posted at TMB....

VIDEO: Allen and Collins Last Days on The Trail (1)
Brenda wrote: We need a changed in Maine. Vote Democrat......

CNN: Collins campaign a rare success among Republicans (5)
pete miller wrote: To james; yes, collins probably has done a good job helping mainers- so ha...

Absence makes debate get stronger (1)
pete miller wrote: Petty arguements about attendance in times like these? people who are votin...