Arts blog



Blog Index
March 19, 2009
Can We Be Too Careful?
Posted by Peter Cutler

There is a legal requirement that cats and dogs have updated rabies shots on a periodic basis. A visit to the local veterinary clinic generally results in the rabies vaccination, Lyme disease inoculation, heartworm protection, general health check, etc. - procedures recommended as preventative health care.

Put the cost all of these treatments together and one can understand why the modern veterinary clinic tends to resemble any other health facility, complete with X-ray, laboratory and in-patient facilities. For those who have a close relationship with animal companions this can be a reassuring, if expensive, safety net.

The annual "preventative visit" for our dog turned into a lengthy ordeal when she developed what at first appeared to be a vaccine reaction, suddenly coupled with an apparent urinary tact infection. The bright, happy, playful animal that I took in for her appointment turned, in a few short hours into a miserable, lethargic, incontinent creature who could barely move her hind quarters, refused all food and appeared to be in constant pain.

After two more visits, a number of hours hooked to an intravenous hydration system, X-rays, lab tests, steroid and antibiotic injections and several days of intensive home nursing I finally have my friend back.

The experience was emotionally exhausting and financially trying and has convinced me that one should take as much care in choosing a treatment provider for their animals as we do for our other family members. Something went very wrong somehow and I have not been able to determine exactly what or why.

The attending vet informed me that sometimes animals have a reaction to vaccines and that this reaction will occasionally trigger an incipient illness that may normally take longer to manifest overt symptoms. Plausible, but it got me to thinking.

My sister-in-law, who is employed in a hospital, commiserated with us over this incident and related that her medical facility treats vaccination and inoculation reactions on a frequent basis. Flu shots, in particular, she said have resulted in some very severe symptoms that required inpatient treatment.

I personally have avoided flu shots for years because in the past they have always made me feel worse than any occasional bout with the flu (this is not a practice that I am advocating; everyone should consult their healthcare provider regarding immunizations).

Still, there is a nagging question that surfaced for me. Who is to say that something has not been added to vaccines and immunization serums to prolong their "shelf life" so that new batches need not be manufactured so frequently? And what effect might such additions have on some recipients?

Let me be clear. Preventative medicine has made an enormous difference in reducing the danger of such diseases as polio, smallpox, diphtheria and other childhood menaces. When I was very young, immunizations were given as a routine part of grade school. Again, a health provider is the best source of advice regarding the need for and number of immunizations required for children and adults.

And yet ……… I hear of young children receiving as many as six shots during one visit. I see advertisements trumpeting products that will provide a "germ-free" environment for our family. I read of great increases in the number of asthmatics and once uncommon allergies. Scientists debate a potential link between certain immunizations and autism.

In general, our life expectancy has increased significantly over the last hundred years. But our diet (and medicines?) now contains many additives that might have an effect on our immune systems and general health, not to mention other potential detriments from many different environmental factors. Are we giving our natural immune systems the opportunity to develop by confronting and overcoming the hazards that abound in our surroundings?

In a life that has spanned nearly seven decades and afforded me a close-up view of medicine, law, accounting, business and politics I have developed the suspicion that individual practitioners (including "experts") are not infallibly right and their services should be sought with a degree of respectful skepticism and caution.

Gee, "Life 101".

Posted by Peter Cutler at 10:41 AM

E-mail this entry to a friend

Comments

3/6
Moening Cartoon 7:46 AM
Cutler Essay 11:06 AM

3/19
Moening Cartoon 6:48 AM
Cutlet Essay 10:41 AM

Cutler, don'tyou want people to see Moening's cartoons?

A fellow cartoonist.

Posted by
March 19, 2009 11:26 PM

Sure. I always look at Mr. Moening's work and I admire his talent. I wish that I had some artistic ability.

Posted by Peter Cutler
March 20, 2009 12:57 PM

Cutler writes: "Sure. I always look at Mr. Moening's work and I admire his talent. I wish that I had some artistic ability"


If you admire his talent so much, why do you post your essays only 4 hours after his and send his cartoons into oblivion?

A fellow cartoonist.

Posted by
March 20, 2009 01:45 PM

Do your homework. I am not making a conscious effort to "downplay" anyone's work. You use two incidences out of 38 postings that I have written.

You appear willing to accept the notion that somehow my writings take away from Mr. Moening's work simply because I coincidentally have posted twice on the same day that he has. Do you feel that his talent is diminished simply because I am also on the site?

Or perhaps, since you are unwilling to identify yourself, your issue is really with me.

As I have stated before, if someone does not agree with me and is willing to state their case in an intelligent and well-constructed posting then I will be happy to give them space.

But if all you can offer is this kind of boring, repetitive personal attack without substantiation, then I will delete such further comments.

Posted by Peter Cutler
March 21, 2009 09:36 AM

You are going to deny me freedom of speech, Cutler.

Moening's cartoon lasted a mere 4 hours before you sent it to oblivion.

You have a right to write anything you wish, but don't you believe that people should have a right to view Moening's cartoons for more than a mere 4 hours before you send it to oblivion?

Indeed, delete this if you don't want others to read it, but what does that say about your vaulted freedom of personal rights including freedom of speech?

You simply cannot have it both ways.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine,

Posted by A fellow Cartoonist
March 21, 2009 02:23 PM

You are going to deny me freedom of speech, Cutler.

Moening's cartoon lasted a mere 4 hours before you sent it to oblivion.

You have a right to write anything you wish, but don't you believe that people should have a right to view Moening's cartoons for more than a mere 4 hours before you send it to oblivion?

Indeed, delete this if you don't want others to read it, but what does that say about your vaulted freedom of personal rights including freedom of speech?

You simply cannot have it both ways.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine,

Posted by A fellow Cartoonist
March 21, 2009 02:26 PM

You are going to deny me freedom of speech, Cutler.

Moening's cartoon lasted a mere 4 hours before you sent it to oblivion.

You have a right to write anything you wish, but don't you believe that people should have a right to view Moening's cartoons for more than a mere 4 hours before you send it to oblivion?

Indeed, delete this if you don't want others to read it, but what does that say about your vaulted freedom of personal rights including freedom of speech?

You simply cannot have it both ways.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine,

Posted by A fellow Cartoonist
March 21, 2009 02:28 PM

You are going to deny me freedom of speech, Cutler.

Moening's cartoon lasted a mere 4 hours before you sent it to oblivion.

You have a right to write anything you wish, but don't you believe that people should have a right to view Moening's cartoons for more than a mere 4 hours before you send it to oblivion?

Indeed, delete this if you don't want others to read it, but what does that say about your vaulted freedom of personal rights including freedom of speech?

You simply cannot have it both ways.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine,

Posted by A fellow Cartoonist
March 21, 2009 02:31 PM

You are going to deny me freedom of speech, Cutler.

You did not just post twice on the same day he did; you twice posted 4 hours after he did. Moening's cartoon lasted a mere 4 hours before you sent it to oblivion.

You, of course have a right to write anything you wish, and I agree about MUCH of what you write, but don't you believe that people should have a right to view Moening's cartoons for more than a mere 4 hours before you send them to oblivion?

Don't you thing you should look to see what is posted before you and when; after all, it is apparent you spend a lot of time on your essays. How would you feel if Moening posted a cartoon 4 hours after you posted that long essay above.

How many people could read your essay in 4 hours; how many in 12?

So, feel free to delete this if you don't want others to read it, but what does that say about your your's and all Mainers' treasured freedom of personal rights including freedom of speech?

You simply cannot have it both ways.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine.

Posted by A Fellow Cartoonist
March 21, 2009 02:57 PM

What on earth are you talking about? Mr. Moening's cartoon is still on the "Press Herald Post" blog site, right below my posting. Try clicking on "Press Herald Post" if you want to see postings for the past couple of weeks (there have not been many, unfortunately).

I do not have the ability to send any entries on that site "to oblivion".

If you look at "Maine, Now and Then" you will find only my postings because that is my site and my articles are the only ones there. If you check other authors' sites you will discover that the same holds true.

If you are going to accuse me of something, at least have the courtesy to be accurate.

A blog is defined as "a personal online journal". Any of the bloggers at the Press Herald Post site have the ability to edit their personal blog site, including any comments. The Press Herald Post site is edited by members of the PPH editorial staff.

You can indeed say anything that you want - that does not mean that I have to make it part of my article.

Why the attack when I have not done what you are accusing me of?

Posted by Peter Cutler
March 21, 2009 06:50 PM

To the honorable Mr Cutler whose political views I share:

Perhaps you and your fellow bloggers know about the secret of clicking on the big read words "Press Herald Post." And maybe your editor does review and approve of your posting a meer 4 hours after anotherblogger, but most visitors to your blog probably go the old fashioned way:

We visit the online front past of the Press Herald site, we review the blogs listed at the lower right, we may click on yours listed there, and when yours comes up, Moening's is NOT shown below yours.

This secret clicking on the big red letters may be known to a few, but I doubt that is NOT the route followed by the many who read your post.

Thus, Moening's wonderful cartoons do, indeed, disappear when visitors come in this NORMAL way.

We NORMAL readers haven't been allowed into the secret club of those who go to blogs, then clock on Press Herald Post, and Then see everything in the last few days.

I am not attacking you. I am suggesting a bit of politeness. Mr Honoralble Cutler: give Moening's cartoons at least 12 hours on the front page before you send them to oblivion for we NORMAL readers.

A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine.

Posted by A fellow cartoonist
March 23, 2009 07:31 AM

If you are visiting the "online front past of the Press Herald site", then you will today see Mr. Moening's most recent posting. By scrolling down, either with the scroll bar or by using your mouse to move the cursor down the page to the bottom, you will next encounter my posting and following that Mr. Moening's last posting.

If you follow your apparent preferred method and click on "Maine, Now and Then" at the right side of the page, you will find all of my postings (38) and none of Mr. Moening's. Should you choose "Patrick Moening" you will discover all 45 of his postings, but none of mine. The same holds true for the sites of Peter Hayward, Arthur Fink, etc.

I post when I have selected a subject and completed an entry, not to be in competition with any other authors. I do not believe that it is impolite to post on the same day as another author, since we both share space on the Press Herald Post main site.

Posted by Peter Cutler
March 23, 2009 10:00 AM

No, Mr Cutler, whose political views I mostly agree with, by going to the front page, bottom right and clicking on "Improving Maine's economy" I am taken to "http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/blogs/phpost/040417.html".

There I find his very funny cartoon. I cannot scroll down and find anything. Only his post is on this page. There are no posts from the past week shown as there is when one uses you magical red letters.

Thus when NORMAL people go to the to the front page (or even to the blog page) and click on the TITLE of the blog entry, we are taken ONLY to that blog, and no others are shown underneath.

I think those Red Letters are like some secret handshake that only a few know. The rest of us take the obvious route.

Using the link from the title, people have NO IDEA what was posted only 4 hours before.

Try it if you don't believe me.

That is what NORMAL people do. They don't know to click on the red letters you mentioned; we don't have time to learn these tricks which are NOT explained on the site.

If the link on the front page went to where the magic Red Letters take one, you would be absolutely right, Moening's or anyone else's 4 hour earlier posts would NOT disappear when you or others post.

Why do I care?

Because 8 years ago I started my now successful as a cartoonist by posting on a small southern newspaper's website even though I live in the Penobscot county.

After a few years, a syndicate offered me a one year contract to produce 15 cartoons a month for them to sell to their client newspapers.

After that exposure, I now produce my cartoons for one of the major newspaper holding companies.

Moening deserves for his cartoons to be seen for at least 12 hours before you or your fellow bloggers knock them out of the url path that MOST readers use.

And you too, Mr Cutler deserve the same 12 hours before a fellow blogger sends your blog to oblivion from the url path MOST people use.

If Jean is your editor, ask her how most people get to YOUR posts, from the Magic Letters, or from the link on the front page which takes you only to the "post du jour" or in your case, the "post du moment."

And why can't I identify myself, because my contract prevents me allowing my name to appear in any newspaper not owned by my employer.

A fellow cartoonist from the real Maine


Posted by A fellow cartoonist
March 23, 2009 10:43 AM

No, Mr Cutler, whose political views I mostly agree with, by going to the front page, bottom right and clicking on "Improving Maine's economy" I am taken to "http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/blogs/phpost/040417.html".

There I find his very funny cartoon. I cannot scroll down and find anything. Only his post is on this page. There are no posts from the past week shown as there is when one uses you magical red letters.

Thus when NORMAL people go to the to the front page (or even to the blog page) and click on the TITLE of the blog entry, we are taken ONLY to that blog, and no others are shown underneath.

I think those Red Letters are like some secret handshake that only a few know. The rest of us take the obvious route.

Using the link from the title, people have NO IDEA what was posted only 4 hours before.

Try it if you don't believe me.

That is what NORMAL people do. They don't know to click on the red letters you mentioned; we don't have time to learn these tricks which are NOT explained on the site.

If the link on the front page went to where the magic Red Letters take one, you would be absolutely right, Moening's or anyone else's 4 hour earlier posts would NOT disappear when you or others post.

Why do I care?

Because 8 years ago I started my now successful as a cartoonist by posting on a small southern newspaper's website even though I live in the Penobscot county.

After a few years, a syndicate offered me a one year contract to produce 15 cartoons a month for them to sell to their client newspapers.

After that exposure, I now produce my cartoons for one of the major newspaper holding companies.

Moening deserves for his cartoons to be seen for at least 12 hours before you or your fellow bloggers knock them out of the url path that MOST readers use.

And you too, Mr Cutler deserve the same 12 hours before a fellow blogger sends your blog to oblivion from the url path MOST people use.

If Jean is your editor, ask her how most people get to YOUR posts, from the Magic Letters, or from the link on the front page which takes you only to the "post du jour" or in your case, the "post du moment."

And why can't I identify myself, because my contract prevents me allowing my name to appear in any newspaper not owned by my employer.

A fellow cartoonist from the real Maine


Posted by A fellow cartoonist
March 23, 2009 10:44 AM

Wow, "fellow cartoonist," if you can't figure out how to find "hot links" on a web site maybe this whole "internet" thing is a bit much for you.

Why don't you share your name and post a link to your cartoons? Any contract that prevents an American citizen's name from appearing in a newspaper wouldn't hold up in any court in this nation. Heck, just post a link to where your cartoons appear - I'm sure that company would appreciate the traffic.

And, as a cartoonist, Moening is really, really bad.

Posted by Sharky
March 23, 2009 10:54 AM

Sharky,

whose comments I have admired until now, how many people do you think would identify thebig red words "Press Herald Post" at http://pressherald.mainetoday.com/blogs/ as a link.


Sure the words "Improving Maine's economy" is a link, but how many readers...


You have debated with some of these readers, how many...

and why should they...

Why not somehow make the link obvious.


A fellow cartoonist in the real Maine

(and I know who I am; I don't have to prove it)

Posted by a fellow cartoonist
March 23, 2009 05:08 PM

The crux of the matter appears to be that if one enters the Press Herald Post blog section by clicking on the featured entry at the bottom of "Home" page, then one will be taken to the most recent entry for that day and only that entry will be displayed.

In this, our unidentified commentator is correct.

I was not familiar with this linkage path.

If one clicks on the red "Press Herald Post" link at the top of the page, then all articles for the past couple of weeks listed in chronological order will be available by scrolling down.

If one selects a particular author from the list in red at the top right hand side of the page, then only the work of that particular author will be displayed.

Hopefully, I have covered all bases with this attempt at explanation. As with most computer links, there are several ways to travel to the information that you want to review.

Again, I am not trying to send any other contributor "to oblivion" but I will continue to submit for publication on my schedule alone. My apologies to Mr. Moening if he feels slighted, but I suspect that he is confident that his work can stand on its own and is not concerned with a "ranking system" as long as his talent is reviewed and appreciated.

"A fellow cartoonist" could show his support by making favorable comments in Mr. Moening's "Comments" section.

Posted by Peter Cutler
March 24, 2009 09:12 AM

Pardon my sarcasm. It still surprises me that people haven't grasped the interactive nature of the internet yet. It's not a static page.

Different web pages require different learning curves to fully appreciate. As a general rule, simply scroll your cursor around a new page and see where your cursor turns into a hand - that's a link. Take a peek at the "status bar" at the bottom of your browser and you should see a URL which will tell you where that link goes.

As more users learn standard web navigation techniques, more web designers are making some links less "obvious." That allows them to unclutter the page. As Mr. Cutler stated, there are often several ways of navigating to the same area of a site. Some will be obvious, others not. Explore.

Still waiting to see your cartoons.

Posted by Sharky
March 24, 2009 10:55 AM

Please pardon my sarcasm, it was unnecessary. It still surprises me that people haven't grasped the interactive nature of the internet yet. It's not a static page.

Different web pages require different learning curves to fully appreciate. As a general rule, simply scroll your cursor around a new page and see where your cursor turns into a hand - that's a link. Take a peek at the "status bar" at the bottom of your browser and you should see a URL which will tell you where that link goes before you click.

As more users learn standard web navigation techniques, more web designers are making some links less "obvious." That allows them to unclutter the page. If you find a standard feature you enjoy, learn the quick path to it, or bookmark it.

As Mr. Cutler stated, there are often several ways of navigating to the same area of a site. Some will be obvious, others not. Explore.

Still waiting to see your cartoons.

Posted by Sharky
March 24, 2009 11:00 AM

Dag nab system....

Posted by Sharky
March 24, 2009 11:01 AM

Post a comment









Remember personal info?








Blog Index
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Most Recent Comments
FairPoint Communications -- Much Too Little to Be So Big (2)
Peter Hayward wrote: Peter A piece of data data that did not make it into the essay above--ju...

Can We Be Too Careful? (20)
Sharky wrote: Dag nab system.......

Where's my bailout? (2)
wharfrat70 wrote: This hits the nail right on the head. Hate seeing my tax dollars go to bai...

Freedom vs. "Equality" (1)
willieA wrote: You failed to mention that Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe have been in the...

Forget this N word and get the banks lending again (1)
Peter Cutler wrote: Certainly the banks need to start lending again and it is obvious that inst...

Will It Work? (1)
Letter to Collins wrote: It will never work and inflation is going to be like an angry wolf at the d...

Would You Take THIS Professor’s Economic Advice? (3)
Peter Cutler wrote: What "myths" am I advocating? I certainly am in favor of "reform of Fede...

Are Maine media critics piling on the Portland Press Herald? (3)
wrote: Love you Sparky! Go boy go!...

Archives By date
July 08 (38)
June 08 (39)
May 08 (27)





RSS
Subscribe



Interested in becoming one of our community bloggers? Send us an e-mail.