
Recreational Fishermen Revolt!
Recreational fishermen are up in arms! Soon they’ll be protesting in the streets of Augusta, pounding on the doors of the Legislature. Liberté! Equalité! Fraternité! Unite against bureaucracy!
So what’s the fuss? Because a recent federal law now requires NOAA Fisheries to establish a registry of recreational saltwater anglers by 2011. The law empowers NMFS to charge a minimal fee. However, states that have a pre-existing recreational saltwater license system are exempt. In anticipation, the Baldacci administration is proposing a Maine saltwater license, to cost between $15 and $25 annually, which will supersede a federal license. The new state revenues will be earmarked to improve saltwater access and facilities for recreational fishermen.
Good reason to burn the Governor in effigy! Not really. Recreational fishermen, as an interest group, have got to be smarter than this.
The first reason to support the Maine Department of Marine Resources license proposal is just too obvious. If the State does not do this, the Feds will – count on it. A registry is national law. Future fees collected by the Feds will not be spent in Maine – count on that too.
Second reason is that saltwater angling is increasing in popularity. You have to stand in line some days, shoulder to shoulder, to go striper fishing on the Mousam and Ogunquit Rivers – from June right through to October. On weekends there is a virtual boat parade of recreational craft trolling the Saco. Look at the license plates of the cars parked bumper-to-bumper on the shoulders of the road – half of them are from out of state! You can bet that this added traffic costs Maine residents. So why shouldn’t non-residents pony up through a license fee?
The third reason is the most important though. Fact is that saltwater recreational fisheries are growing every year, in size and impact on the resource. The current system for collecting data on recreational effort, MRFSS, is just not working. The polling is too random. Therefore, when fishery scientists do stock assessments on species like striped bass, cod, haddock or black back flounder, they can make a pretty accurate estimate of catch by commercial fishermen, but only a guess of catch by recreational fishermen.
When the numbers are uncertain, science advice to managers is usually very conservative. The law now requires that scientists and managers set firm caps on fishing effort annually. These caps will not be exceeded. In the future, managers will have a pretty good idea of how much catch to allocate to commercial or charter vessels. But unless they have accurate data on recreational landings, the catch limits on personal recreational fishermen will be conservative. That means that in the future, without good data, chances are that recreational fishermen could be bumping up against limits on catch and they wouldn’t have the tools or information to negotiate something more appropriate.
So what’s the cost of ignorance? Compare that to an annual investment in a saltwater license. $15 is less than the price of a tank of gas for an outboard, for pity sake.
E-mail this entry to a friend
You hit the nail on the head when you said if we don't take this into our own hands, the feds will take it into theirs. And into their pockets. So we'll be out both the whopping $15 and money for our state.
One nitpicky point: "angler" is a swell word and all, but note that the regulations include ALL recreational saltwater fishermen. That includes the four or five folks that spearfish off the great coast of Maine.
One on one, baby. Rowr.
Posted by Sharky
June 19, 2008 02:26 PM
Rip Cunningham wrote a very articulate letter published yesterday in the Press Herald. His point was the same, that the State should take the lead in licensing and channel the benefits toward improving recreational fisheries.
So, I'm unclear. Who are the spear fishermen to whom Sharkey is referring. Are these scuba divers? Or is he thinking of harpooning tuna -- the "stick boat" fleet?
Posted by
John WilliamsonJune 20, 2008 07:30 AM
Yes, scuba divers. The proud, the few, the wet.
"Angling" means hook and line. The proposed regulations go beyond that.
Posted by Sharky
June 20, 2008 12:44 PM
That's good to know and makes perfect sense. Spear fishing may seem a minor contributor to fishing mortality but it's only fair that they be in the mix. Divers have access to more diverse species than anglers. And then of course you never know what the future may bring -- if the price of electric mini-submarines ever became affordable we might see a whole fleet of spearfishermen out there chasing dabs or something.
You never know.
Posted by
John WilliamsonJune 20, 2008 01:17 PM
I checked with the Fish and Wildlife folks last year, and sadly enough, you can't spear halibut, stripers or salmon around here. The three fish one might most want to hunt...
And, of course, you can't lay a finger on those deliciously fat lobsters. The ocean floor is crawling with 'em. Yum!
Posted by Sharky
June 20, 2008 02:42 PM
Lobsters! Diving! Heaven forbid man, don't even think about it. Do you want to get shot!
Posted by
John WilliamsonJune 20, 2008 02:45 PM
Aww, I know. I never touch 'em. I don't even like to go near them, so no lobsterman gets the wrong idea. Which is hard, considering how many there are out there, crawling all over, waving at me with their fat little claws...
I almost wore myself out cleaning a bag full of crabs the other day. Whew! Not the same thing.
Posted by Sharky
June 21, 2008 06:52 PM
Nothing beats a fresh crabmeat salad. I prefer rock crab to lobster. I spent some a couple of seasons on an offshore lobster boat and we'd get crabs as big as a dinner plate. All the work picking them just makes the meat taste all the sweeter.
Posted by
John WilliamsonJune 22, 2008 07:47 AM
Post a comment
Blog Index