Covering school consolidation
After six months of study and debate, the Maine Legislature finally adopted a school consolidation plan as part of the $6.3 billion two-year state budget passed late last night.
This is a big story for us.
While drastically different from the plan originally proposed by Gov. John Baldacci, the plan does make some major changes. The number of school districts will shrink from 290 to about 80, instead of the 26 districts that Baldacci’s plan proposed. The impact on local school systems could be dramatic.
Right now we have two reporters working on stories for Friday’s paper. Ann Kim, in our State House bureau, is writing a story that looks at all the changes and what they mean. Basically she’s trying to explain how it will work. Beth Quimby, our education reporter based in Portland, is out in the field right now talking to students, parents, administrators, people on the street. Her goal is to get a sense about what the public feels about this school consolidation plan. Do they support it? Hate it? Do people know what’s going on?
The biggest challenge with stories like this is that, quite often, the people in charge of implementing the law – the local school administrators, state officials, etc. – don’t really know yet how it’s supposed to work. That makes it difficult to answer the most important question that readers are likely to have today: What does it mean for my school district? I have the same question. Since my kids’ school is already part of a district, is it likely to result in any changes for me?
We'll try to answer that tomorrow, but if you have any ideas about impact in your town, send them along.
E-mail this entry to a friend
I don't normally agree with Gov. Baldacci but from an economic perspective this makes all the sense in the world. I believe most school committees have pushed their budgets through most town meetings on the scare tactic that the children will suffer if the committee doesn't get everything they ask for. They seem to completely disregard town residents on fixed or limited incomes that don’t have the ability to pay huge increases each year. Many school budgets have increased higher than the rate of inflation for a number of years.
Cut some of the school district's administration and/or benefit packages of the administration otherwise costs will continue to soar. My hat is off to Susan Gendron and what she is trying to accomplish of providing adequate, comprehensive education at a cost affordable to “all” taxpayers, not just the wealthiest in the cities and towns of Maine.
Posted by
D.M.June 8, 2007 08:33 AM
I have frequently commented in the papers under Maine Today against school consolidation and thank the paper for the opportunity to do so. The push for consolidation will change rural schools in Maine in many different ways. Not only will the administration change but also the as part of the budget deal, schools are supposed to cut 5% out of maintenance, special education, and transportation.
The bill that passed is a little better for rural schools but takes away local control and moves it to a Regional School Board based on the SAD governance model. This will present problems for many small towns that have kept their schools open because they are School Unions. They town has had direct control over the schools and this has been lost to the new Regional School Board. Giving up the decision-making power to a regional authority is a step backwards in my opinion.
The smaller towns will also have less voting power on the regional board because the votes are based on school population out of 1000 votes. Many smaller towns will have limited voting rights and less of an opportunity to make decisions.
The administrative changes are supposed to save $36.5 million dollars and not $66 million. The other $30 million is in cuts from the transportation, special education, and also facilities and maintenance.
It would be nice to see a story or two on how how this new system of governance will effect rural eastern and northern Maine. Many people in rural areas fought against the bill.
As a teacher in a small school, I fell that within five years the bill will have a devastating impact on small rural schools and many will be closed. Many small towns depend on their school as a center of activity for the town that ties it together. It would be a shame to see this lost. It also is a shame that towns also must give their existing schools and their assets to the new regional districts without compensation.
The state has pulled a corporate takeover of Maine K-12 education. Th state says it now pays 55% and will tell you how to run things. Many things are lost because of this but hopefully a balance can be mandated with local input and controls and efficiencies.
Posted by
George CrawfordJune 10, 2007 09:30 AM